More Nakoma taxes paid; penalties still an issue
County coffers were recently replenished with a second check in the amount of $235,508 from Nakoma Associates LP (NALP) for the payment of back taxes on Gold Mountain assets purchased from bankruptcy last April. This reduces the outstanding tax bill for the Nakoma Golf Resort to $440,000 and brings the total of Nakoma Associates’ tax payments to $440,500, a halfway mark.
Read more: More Nakoma taxes paid; penalties still an issue
County certifies election results
Travel management decision announced
Plumas National Forest officials have completed the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and Record of Decision (ROD) for the Forest Service’s Motorized Travel Management Project (Subpart B).
The effort focused on the growing number of routes that are not part of the authorized national forest transportation system (routes with numbers) throughout the forest and made a decision on which of those unauthorized routes should be added to the system.
Read more: Travel management decision announced
Indian Valley Hospital reuse study is complete
Indian Valley Editor
The reuse study for the old Indian Valley Hospital building has been completed and is ready for review.
Indian Valley Health Care District Chairman Guy McNett will make sure there is a copy for the public to view at the Greenville Branch Library.
Read more: Indian Valley Hospital reuse study is complete
Hooked up yet? Meeting flush with sewer issues
Indian Valley Editor
What will happen to property owners who have not yet hooked up to the 1998 sewer extension, as required?
That is one of the sewer issues up for discussion and action Wednesday, Nov. 10, at 6:30 p.m. in the Indian Valley Civic Center at 430 Main St. in Greenville.
Read more: Hooked up yet? Meeting flush with sewer issues
Residents unhappy with transfer station closure
Several Graeagle residents voiced their displeasure about the impending closure of their local transfer site during the public comment section of the Board of Supervisors Tuesday, Nov. 2, meeting.
They were upset with the decision; the way it was made; and the fact that it wasn’t on the board’s agenda when the motion was made.
Read more: Residents unhappy with transfer station closure