NewLogo
  • coldwellbanker
  • Linda Gillam
  • image
  • almanor energy

EPHC takes $1.1 million hit from MediCal cuts

By Linda Satchwell
Public Relations Coordinator
Eastern Plumas Health Care

Eastern  Plumas Health Care was informed Thursday, Oct. 27, that the Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) was approving California’s request to cut MediCal payments to its hospital skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) by 10 percent of 2008 rates (in effect a 23 percent cut).

The cuts will be retroactive to June 1, causing EPHC to have to underwrite care it has already given back. Since 93 percent of its SNF patients are on MediCal, this amounts to a $1.1 million hit per year — an unsustainable reduction in revenue to a hospital system that has already scaled back services.

The executive team at EPHC met Friday morning to assess the likely damage these cuts will cause the hospital, and to begin constructing a plan of action that might save the SNFs and will save the hospital (which includes an acute care hospital, four clinics and emergency and outpatient services) as a whole.

EPHC is hit especially hard by this ruling because its SNFs are a large part of its business, with facilities in both Loyalton and Portola, and a total of 59 patients. In contrast its hospital has nine acute beds, only three or four of which are usually filled.

Chief Executive Officer Tom Hayes has said repeatedly that the hospital has “zero days of cash on hand.” The executive team has begun what will likely be several months of triage of a different sort. They’re discussing a variety of solutions aimed, primarily, at keeping the hospital viable.

They’re also looking at ways to keep the SNFs functioning. These include a request for a temporary freeze on the SNF’s USDA loan payments, which amount to $56,000 per month. Hayes said that if it wasn’t possible to freeze payments for a time, EPHC would likely default on these loans.

Meanwhile, the California Hospital Association’s law firm, Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC, filed a lawsuit Monday, Oct. 31, to stop the cuts from going forward, beginning with a request for an immediate injunction against the state. As hospital Chief Financial Officer Jeri Nelson put it, this doesn’t solve the problem, but it “could buy us some time.”

Nelson is tasked with figuring out what the hospital might look like if the cuts do take effect and, in the worst case scenario, both SNFs are forced to cut way back or close altogether. Without that major source of revenue, she said, the discussion about what services this community really uses and what it needs most is no longer a long-range plan — it becomes today’s reality.

Hayes scheduled meetings last Friday at the Portola and Loyalton SNFs and invited all EPHC staff to attend so they could hear firsthand about the impending state cuts, and what EPHC plans to do to save itself. While Hayes laid out the problem in stark terms — “We have to come up with $100,000 a month” — he added, “We’re trying to do whatever we can to keep the SNFs open. This unit (Portola), the hospital and Loyalton are our No. 1 goal.”

Hayes continued, “Within a week or two we should be able to figure out whether we have viable alternatives (for the SNFs). ... I’m not going to promise you we’ll be able to solve this, but we’re going to give it our best shot.” In Portola, staff chose to stay strong. “We’re known as survivors,” said one. “We’re mountain people,” another added.

“Most of all, this hurts our patients,” said Hayes. “This decision by our government is heartless to our patients — these are their homes — and our employees who depend on their jobs for survival.”

The state, after making what Hayes terms “draconian” cuts, requires EPHC to come up with a plan to relocate its residents. Lorraine Noble and Sue Whitfield, directors of the Portola and Loyalton SNFs, respectively, are tasked with devising this worst-case scenario plan, which involves attempting to find “beds” for their 59 residents.

They’ll have to look up and down the state. They won’t be allowed to dwell on the fact that their residents will be placed, if they can find places at all, far from loved ones, friends and the home towns they’ve known for a lifetime. Already, Noble said she’s found 10 beds in Susanville, 10 in Quincy and one in Truckee. This week, Noble will start making calls further afield.

Fifteen days after filing this plan with the state, EPHC can give its residents a 30-day relocation notice. Residents can actually stay for another 60 days after that.

But, it’s what will happen to these residents if they’re forced out that concerns everyone at EPHC the most. Case in point are Gerald (age 98) and Agnes (95) Gervais. They’ve lived most of their lives in Portola, have worked, volunteered, grown up and grown old here. They’ve known each other since Agnes was 7 years old. They share a room at the Portola SNF, and on Oct. 21, they celebrated their 72nd wedding anniversary there. This skilled nursing facility is their home; its staff, their family.

Betty Folchi, their friend and conservator, has known them since 1949. She was a “young bride that year, and through my church, I was introduced to this amazing couple. They have been the pillars of our small rural community.” Agnes was “the lady who made 50 pounds of candy every year” for the church and the VA hospital in Reno: “angel of mercy to any and all who needed her help for all these years.”

A few years ago, Anges began to have balance problems, fell several times, and finally had a stroke. She entered the Portola SNF in September 2010, and her husband Gerry joined her only two months later. He’d previously worked for the railroad, was the city’s mayor and was very active in community affairs. Now, virtually blind and completely deaf, he couldn’t survive at home without Agnes, so the two of them made their home — together still — in the Portola SNF.

According to Folchi, they had a small life savings of $60,000 that she used to pay for their care. When that ran out, they turned to MediCal, which helps, along with their railroad employees pension. They are the living victims of these state cuts. Both the hospital and the Gervaises will find it hard to survive without EPHC’s skilled nursing facilities.

 

avatar
the right thing to do is to NOT take on anymore irresponsibles.& then you can eventually close the programes down.<br />like ssi & meda what ever<br />mz thatcher said it best<br />'The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money'
VOTES:1
avatar
it should be cut some<br />&<br />a great a opportunity for a lesson in life.<br />look what happens if your irresponsible & depend on hand outs from big bro<br />hay look @ responsibles that buy own own insurance<br />it's about life choices
VOTES:1
avatar
Kurt-This SPA was approved by the State of Ca. signed by Dem Gov Brown. Then approved by CMS. Ca. is responsible for this decision and it is run by Democrats. The only fault the Republicans had was to not effectively convince the Dems of how bad this decision was. 836-1674 if you want facts.
VOTES:0
avatar
oh ok Frank<br />sooo it's just another failed socialist program for the irresponsibles<br />goooood to know
VOTES:1
avatar
All this talk about Obamacare... These cuts have nothing to do with Obamacare, that is a separate issue. These are specific to a State Plan Ammendment first approved by the State of California and then by CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services).
VOTES:-2
avatar
& yet folks come from all over the world to get healed<br />folds going over to "socalized med" countrys? not so much,,,prob because of the 2+year wait
VOTES:1
avatar
The so-called "finest health-care in the world" costs 2x as much to deliver worse results than any other Western country; while not covering 1/5 of Americans at all. People dying in ER waiting rooms or ruthlessly cut from coverage for developing cancer is not the best health-care in the world.
VOTES:1
avatar
Anyone claiming that the ACA cuts Medicare/Medicaid/Medical benefits needs to back it up with hard facts, and pointing to specific provisions. <br /><br />It's Republicans that are crying for more and more cuts to everything, not Democrats. Claiming otherwise is a denial of reality.
VOTES:-2
avatar
&<br />1st part of obamacare has taken efect as of the 1st of the year,,,call your doc or the hospital<br />the destruction of the finest healthcare in the world has allready started
VOTES:1
avatar
yes "Health Care reform" = obamacare<br />the tea party doesn't have any thing to do with it, thay beleve in self responsibility & not hand outs for the irresponsibles<br />in other words thay buy there own insurance
VOTES:2
avatar
Tea Party politics at work. Cut, cut, cut, cut, cut ... then complain about the cuts.<br /><br />No reductions in Medical or Medicare are attributable to Health Care reform, given that it hasn't actually taken effect yet.
VOTES:-2
avatar
obama care @ work<br />sorry<br />should get worse
VOTES:4

Camp-Layman-Web-Button

Slusher-Web-Button

HighTechBtn

PlumasDiningCoverWeb
Setting
  • Search area
    • Site
    • Web
  • Search type
    • Web
    • Image
    • News
    • Video
  • Power by JLex
RobinBtn
Yellow Pages
VGCover