Board to discuss moratorium enforcement

Plumas County citizens affected by the cannabis moratorium are stuck in a stalemate between enforcement of the no-grow ordinance and participating in what is now classified as an illegal activity. Many citizens want to know what the county is going to do about it.

At the recent Plumas County Board of Supervisors’ meeting Jan. 16, board members commented on an influx of correspondence they were receiving from disgruntled citizens who demanded action on people growing cannabis in the county.

A temporary county ordinance, established in November, bans all cannabis grows except for the six plant per residence allotment permitted by the passage of Prop. 64. The purpose of the temporary ordinance was to establish the county’s position on cannabis growth in order to inform the state to not issue growth permits to county citizens.

The ordinance can be in effect up to two years, and during that time, a draft permanent ordinance is making its way through county departments. Currently, the ordinance is being reviewed by the planning commission for zoning regulations, after which it will be sent to the board of supervisors for review.

In the meantime, citizens want to know why their neighbors’ grows haven’t been halted by the county. The simple answer is, there is no code enforcement officer to do the job.

District 4 Supervisor Lori Simpson said in an interview that the code enforcement officer position has been empty for over a year. During that time, the county has initiated the process of updating the job description for the position. However, updating a job description also takes permission from the labor union, which slows the process. Simpson said there is currently a list of applicants for the position.

Advertisement

However, the code enforcement officer will have a big job for just one person. Simpson said she anticipates the occasional need for sheriff’s deputies to assist in the enforcement.

“The ideal situation would be to have the level of enforcement we need, and if we need additional help we can get deputies,” said Simpson.

The roles of county departments in enforcement, and who is going to enforce the moratorium is still undecided. Simpson said the board will be discussing it at their next meeting on Feb. 9.

“I am not sure what the plan is,” said Simpson. “I want to hear more of where we are at from staff and county counsel.”

Advertisement

2 thoughts on “Board to discuss moratorium enforcement

  • Was it legal for six suppervizers to pass a law that would effect everyone in the county without putting it to a vote.A small group of well organized very vocal few managed to legislate morality thru six sups they want to enforce it with the building department,and they want the people of plumes co, to pay for it. how many small farms will fail more people on welfare?, more people on meth .Save ou small farms give us a lic to survive,to put money into the system not cost the county how about a local cooperative all the money stays here, money for schools and fire dept keep big cannabis out small local farms. Embrace the medical benefits, spend a million dollars enforcein morality, ou bring a million into our local economy Vot on it.

  • Was it legal for six suppervizers to pass a law that would effect everyone in the county without putting it to a vote.A small group of well organized very vocal few managed to legislate morality thru six sups they want to enforce it with the building department,and they want the people of plumes co, to pay for it. how many small farms will fail more people on welfare?, more people on meth .Save ou small farms give us a lic to survive,to put money into the system not cost the county how about a local cooperative all the money stays here, money for schools and fire dept keep big cannabis out small local farms. Embrace the medical benefits, spend a million dollars enforcein morality, ou bring a million into our local economy Vot on it.

Comments are closed.