2 thoughts on “Portola fire tax defeated”
Comments are closed.
Related Posts
Plumas News is sunsetting; thank you for your support – new entity will be publishing news
After more than 150 years of providing continuous news coverage — first with its newspapers and most recently via this…
Thank you: It’s been a joy and a privilege to bring you the news
By Debra Moore [email protected] Tuesdays are the most difficult. Or is it Mondays? But then Sundays are tough also….
Family Movie Night is this Aug. 4 in Beckwourth
Mark your calendars: The Sierra Christian Church in Beckwourth presents Family Movie Night on Friday, Aug. 4, at 6:30 p.m….
EPHC puts focus on CalAIM program
Lauren Westmoreland [email protected] Eastern Plumas Health Care (EPHC) held a regular meeting of the board of directors on Thursday, July…
Friends of the Library book sale starts Aug. 3
The perfect way to while away a hot summer afternoon is with a good book. And the perfect place to…
Barbie and Oppenheimer coming to the Town Hall Theatre
The Town Hall Theatre announced that in order to keep the doors open, starting Sept. 1, it must raise prices….

Next time you want to raise property taxes, let all the property owners vote. Not just registeted voters. We own four properties in town and support the fire department. We were prepared to pay the more than $600 increase per year for all four properties, to support our fire department. We hope in a time of need, they will continue to be there for us and the community.
It’s sad we were not allowed to vote. We live and work out of town and are registered to vote at our primary residence which is not the City of Portola. We are not slum lords. We are investing in the town and community, fixing it up one house at a time.
We hope next time the city wants to raise property taxes- they let property owners with true vested interest in property values, safety and quality of life in Portola, have a voice / voting opportunity.
It’s unfortunate that the increase was so much, I think the community understands the need for the increase, but once again the council asked for too much. I believe if they would have asked for something more resonable, like $50, it would have passed. I support the need for the money but not this way. Too bad they City had to spend the money for the special election for it to be defeated.